Insight · Empathy & AI Design
Practicing Empathy Is Like Playing a Second‑Person Game
Perfect outcomes can hollow people out. Why the missing perspective in leadership and AI product design is the one you experience through someone else's senses.
Too long; did read
- • Leadership and design oscillate between first-person (conviction), third-person (evaluation), and fourth-person (systems) — but empathy lives in the second person.
- • Second-person thinking is the discipline of temporarily surrendering your default point of view — and you can practice it without feeling it emotionally.
- • AI products expose two polarities: hollow perfection (output feels too good to be yours) and the superpower effect (output expands what you thought possible).
- • Second-person product design asks: "Does the user feel agency, ownership, and recognition of effort?" — not just "Is the output good?"
- • People don't just want outcomes. They want identity, agency, and recognition of effort — even when technology could remove all three.
Four Perspectives
Select a perspective to explore what it means in gaming, leadership, and design.
2nd Person · Responsibility
You experience the world through someone else's senses. You hear what they hear, see what they see, feel their hesitation before you understand it.
Leadership question
"What am I missing from their position?"
Design mode
How does the user experience themselves while using this?
Empathy lives here. Not agreement, not kindness — the discipline of temporarily surrendering your default point of view. You can practice it without feeling it emotionally; you need the cognitive ability to model it well enough that your decisions cease to be naïve.
"Empathy is the discipline of temporarily surrendering your default point of view. You can practice it without feeling it — you need the cognitive ability to model it well enough that your decisions cease to be naïve."
Two AI Polarities
The same AI output can feel empowering to one person and hollowing to another. Neither reaction can be solved by "better output" alone.
Polarity A
The Hollow Perfection Problem
Some users feel uneasy when the output is too perfect. They didn't struggle, iterate, or feel the work happen. The result may be correct, polished, even impressive — but it doesn't feel like theirs. For these users, creativity is tied to effort and internalization.
Polarity B
The Superpower Effect
Other users feel liberated. Suddenly they can do things they've never been able to do: write, design, analyze, express. The AI doesn't diminish authorship — it expands it. The joy comes from bypassing limitations they've lived with their whole lives.
Second‑Person Design in Practice
Designing participation, not just results:
Leave friction where friction creates ownership
Avoid full automation where learning matters
Make contribution visible, not invisible
Design AI as a collaborator, not a replacement
Does this resonate?
Would love to hear why — what landed, what didn't, what it stirred up in your own work.
Share your storyUnlock more
Don't miss future writing — become a paid Substack supporter and keep this going.
Become a supporter