Insight · Culture & Organizations
Organisational Maturity & the Power of Choice
Why some cultural interventions don't work, how to read your organization's maturity through the language it uses, and why thinking in choices rather than decisions changes everything.
Too long; did read
- • Organizations operate on a five-level maturity ladder — from "all life sucks" to "life's great" — and the level is diagnosed through the language people use.
- • Higher-level interventions don't work at lower levels. You can't build shared purpose without first having shared values.
- • The transition from level 1→2 reveals the most powerful lever: showing people they have a choice.
- • Thinking in choices rather than decisions honours the passage of time — context changes, so you're never "reversing a decision," you're making a new choice.
- • Criminal organizations can never reach level 5 — they rob people of the very thing that unlocks growth: the freedom to leave.
The Five Levels
Select a level to explore its language, meaning, and how to move up.
Level 3 · "I'm great"
People compete. The prevailing language is individualistic with no shared identity. Individual achievement is the currency.
In business
Unfortunately common in many business and societal organizations. High performers thrive here but collaborative potential is wasted.
Moving to level 4
Build shared identity through values
Magic happens when people develop a shared sense of identity. Force people to find collaborators so they can achieve greater things than they could alone. Codify shared stories into values — simple, memorable one-liners in verb form.
"Thinking in decisions rather than choices disregards the result of time. When time passes, the context changes. It is no longer 'the same decision' you're reversing — it's a new choice you're making."
Novel Intersections
Choices over decisions
Thinking in decisions disregards the result of time. When time passes, the context changes — it is no longer 'the same decision' you're reversing. Instead, it's a new choice in a new context carrying the consequences of previous choices.
The criminal organization litmus test
A criminal organization can never truly operate on level 5. They justify actions against those who share the same goals and find it unacceptable for you to leave — robbing individuals of choice, the very thing that allows people to move from level 1 to level 2.
Why interventions fail
Higher-level language does not resonate with individuals operating at lower levels. Anyone who hasn't operated on a higher level cannot imagine what it feels like. Their questions circle around lower-level problems, such as 'What about competition?'
Maturity can degrade
The level of operation fluctuates with time — a group may degrade. Teaching your organization to believe in choices rather than decisions is a countermeasure for individuals falling into level 1, especially those at risk of suffering from depression or addiction.
Does this resonate?
Would love to hear why — what landed, what didn't, what it stirred up in your own work.
Share your storyUnlock more
Don't miss future writing — become a paid Substack supporter and keep this going.
Become a supporter